Sunday, December 3, 2006

Blog Critique

Drew


Properly cited sources, not any HTML errors but way too many reference to one source, such style often weakens arguments. Good grammar and spelling, not typos. An easy to read blog, with no extra or unnecessary items on the page that distract from the message being given.



Gerald


Interesting, yet usually style of news and info; better links than most people, such as to sites that are not radicals. Easy to read, to the point, yet enough content to support the argument. All the information properly cited along with other sources.



Tanya


Creative style and look; enough links, though too many to one source. There were obvious things such as a link to “bullets”. Decent usage of words vocabulary wise by not repeating the same words and using very well picked adjectives. HTML coding should be checked, and the blogs needs to be check after posting to make sure everything came out the way it is supposed to look.



Lizzie


Extremely organized blog, everything has support and is not just there. Easy to use when comparing actually documents to paraphrased version. Information well presented along with very well in quote and paragraph citations. Though, not all of the links work.



Michael


Wow, very simplified, no HTML errors. Nice variety of links, along with many links that are actually useful for QUICK referencing. There is a change from modern day vocabulary by using better words which makes it look better overall; and no noticeable grammar errors. Easy to understand well cited. To the point on what the argument or main idea is, but also well supported to official documents and websites.

No comments:

Post a Comment